Skip to content
The litigation workspace for Indian courts

The drafting and research desk built for Indian litigation.

Ingests every document in the matter. Cross-references your evidence with binding precedent. Drafts court-ready filings that cite the right era's statute — before you ask.

Encrypted end-to-end · No model training on your content · DPDP §6 aligned

Supreme Court + 25 High Courts · BNS/BNSS/BSA + IPC/CrPC/IEA era-aware · DPDP §6 aligned

High Courts indexed

Judgments searchable

Draft templates

Format-review checks

Document IntelligenceNEW

A strategy memo for every matter — written before you ask.

Drop a folder of FIRs, statements, contracts, and exhibits into a Smart Folder. Lexarna reads everything, extracts parties + timeline + relief sought, runs first-pass contradiction detection across the file set, and synthesises a one-paragraph case theory plus an attack-and-defence memo. Open the Intelligence tab the next morning — it's ready.

lexarna — strategy memo · Sharma v. Mehta
Case theory · auto-synthesised

"Plaintiff's title rests on a 2019 sale deed; defendant claims adverse possession from 1998. Strongest hook: defendant's own 2015 lease application names plaintiff's father as landlord — fatal to AP claim."

STRONGEST

2015 lease app — admission against interest

WEAKEST

No mutation entry 2019–2024

Inputs: 18 docs · 4 contradictions flagged · synthesised in 2.1s

Research

Answers that quote your evidence and binding precedent — in the same reply.

Scope a research session to a matter and Lexarna ranks chunks from your case file alongside Supreme Court + High Court precedent in a single answer. Lexarna cross-compares them: where your evidence aligns with binding authority, where it diverges, and what's missing. Switch to MAX mode for agentic decomposition — the question is split into 4–5 sub-angles and answered in parallel.

lexarna — cross-corpus answer

QUERY

"What's our exposure on the Section 138 notice?"

[MATTER]Cheque_Demand_Notice.pdf · p.2

Notice demands ₹4.2L — same as cheque amount. Section 138 satisfied.

[CASELAW · SC]M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Medchl Chemicals

Demand exceeding cheque amount renders the notice invalid — strict construction of S.138.

Divergence: Notice is clean but doesn't record dispatch method — defendable in cross.

Knowledge Graph

Find the contradiction before opposing counsel does.

Lexarna builds a knowledge graph of every person, event, and exhibit across the matter and runs two-layer contradiction detection: a first-pass that flags candidate pairs on every ingest, and an on-demand LLM verifier when the lawyer wants confirmation. Evidence is weighted by legal reliability so you know exactly how strong each contradiction is.

lexarna — matter graph · 3 contradictions
Contradictions detected3
PW-2 vs PW-3·timelineLLM-verified

PW-2 places the incident at 9:45 PM; PW-3 records 10:30 PM.

Chargesheet vs FIR·locationauto-flagged

Chargesheet names Sector 12 market; FIR places it at Sector 14.

Case strengthStrong · 8.4 / 10
Physical ×3.0 · 2 itemsForensic ×2.5 · 1 itemDocumentary ×2.0 · 4 items

Library

Two kinds of folders. One library.

Smart folders run the full intelligence pipeline — entity extraction, contradiction detection, strategy memo, cross-corpus research. Default folders are plain document storage for things that don't warrant the pipeline. You pick when you create the folder; you can promote a default folder to smart any time.

lexarna — library

Sharma v. Mehta

Smart · 18 docs · 4 contradictions · memo ready

Acme Corp. — IPO due diligence

Smart · 42 docs · synthesising memo…

Bar Council CLE — 2026-27

Default · 6 docs · storage only

Templates — Bombay HC

Default · 12 docs · storage only

Drafting

112 templates covering every common Indian draft type.

Writs, criminal (bail/quashing/S.138), family law, MACT, DRT/CAT/AFT/NGT, RERA, IBC, DV Act, commercial contracts (MSA/SOW/DPA), tax/GST, and corporate filings. Before generation runs, an applicable-law preview shows exactly which sections will be cited — confirm or edit. Every draft then passes a three-layer format review, so what lands is court-ready, not a first pass.

lexarna — draft · bail application

Draft preview: In the Court of Sessions at New Delhi, Bail Application in the matter of Rajesh Kumar versus State (NCT of Delhi), arising out of FIR No. 234/2026, PS Karol Bagh, under section 318 BNS.

Drafting · bail application auto
Auto-generated · Preserves your firm's style

Find your practice area

Writs & PILsBail & AnticipatoryS.138 NI ActQuashingFamily & DivorceMACT claimsDRT / OACAT · SAT · AFTNGTRERAIBC / NCLTDV ActPOSHCybercrimeMSA / SOW / DPATax & GSTProperty deedsCorporate filingsElection petitionsLegal opinions+ many more
Bail ApplicationWrit PetitionSLPMSADPAWillMACTDRT / OAPOSHCybercrime Complaint

Draft quality

Court-format guaranteed — three layers before you see it.

Every draft passes 43+ checks across three layers (33 deterministic + 10 LLM-judge). Layer 1 runs 33 deterministic checks — cause-title shape, GROUNDS lettered A./B./C., a canonical prayer opener, three-bucket verification. Layer 2 is 10 LLM-judge checks on semantics — party-label drift, era-mismatched statutes, fabricated citations, hallucinated headings. Layer 3 is a surgical auto-rewrite that fixes only the flagged spans and leaves the rest verbatim. Backed by 20+ practice-area format specs — ~165k words of Indian drafting rules.

lexarna — format review · writ petition

Format review pipeline. Layer 1: 33 deterministic checks pass. Layer 2: catches a CrPC citation used for a post-July-2024 matter. Layer 3: auto-rewrite substitutes S.483 BNSS. Result: 0 violations remaining.

Self-learning

Drafts that improve every time you edit them.

Seed the Style Library with a few past drafts and Lexarna mirrors your voice from day one — auto-classifying each exemplar to one of the 112 template types. It then learns silently from your OnlyOffice edits and from your revise instructions, so citation conventions, prayer-clause length, and recurring arguments converge on your firm's house style. Memory is scoped per user, per org, and per matter — team consistency without cross-firm leakage.

lexarna — style adoption · same template

Draft 1 uses a generic voice. After 10 revise instructions and 4 OnlyOffice edits, Draft 10 adopts the firm's voice — a 3-line prayer, lettered reliefs, and the firm's citation style.

Memory scope
userorgmatter

Verification

Every answer passes 5 checks before you see it.

Generic AI tools hallucinate case names and confuse BNS with IPC. Lexarna runs every research answer through this verification pipeline before you see it — and every draft through the three-layer format review above.

Citation Grounding

Every [N] reference is validated against the retrieved corpus. Hallucinated case names are blocked before they reach the UI.

Factual Consistency

Claims in the answer are cross-checked against the cited excerpts. Fabricated entities and self-contradictions are caught.

Jurisdiction & Era

Rule-based check that the answer cites BNS/BNSS for post-July-2024 matters and IPC/CrPC for legacy ones. No mixed-era mistakes.

Legal Language

Enforces Indian legal terminology, honorifics, date formats, and section conventions. Reads like a lawyer wrote it.

Elaboration

Thin answers are detected and automatically expanded with supporting evidence — no one-sentence responses to complex questions.

Plus click-through citations. Every inline [N] opens the full judgment with the exact passage highlighted — court, bench, date, paragraph. Verify everything.

Thinking modes

Pick how deep to think.

From fast lookups to agentic decomposition. The credit cost is shown upfront — no surprises.

Quick

Fast tier

Fast lookups, known citations

1–3 credits

Standard

Standard tier

Balanced research and drafting

3–5 credits

Advanced

Advanced tier

Multi-step legal reasoning

15–25 credits

MAX

MAX · agentic

Decomposes into 4–5 sub-angles, retrieves for each in parallel

50–80 credits

Firm Memory

Insights from one matter help every matter.

Lexarna learns from your research turns — preferred citation style, recurring counter-arguments, judge-specific framing — and surfaces them on future questions when relevant. Scoped per user, per matter, and per firm. Auditable and revocable from Settings → Privacy.

lexarna — relevant prior insight
Firm playbook3 hits

"Justice Khanna prefers concise prayer clauses — 3-line max. Captured from a matter your firm worked on in March."

SCOPE

userorgmatter

Your client data stays yours.

Documents and matters live in your private workspace, encrypted at rest, scoped to your organisation. We never train models on your case content.

A small set of opt-in toggles let you contribute anonymised search patterns or quality-check samples — all granular, all reversible. Full DPDP posture →

Encrypted at rest + TLS 1.3
Org-scoped isolation
No model training on your content
DPDP §6 informed consent

Questions

Launching soon

Try Lexarna with your next matter.

Free during private beta · Plans announced at launch

We're onboarding practitioners one at a time. Join the waitlist and we'll reach out when your spot opens.

Private beta · No credit card required · Existing users sign in